Image
November 30, 2022 |

Privacy News Roundup | November 30, 2022

US News

TikTok’s $92 million settlement

A federal judge from the Northern District Court of Illinois approved TikTok’s $92 million settlement from a 2019 class action suit.

TikTok users alleged that TikTok had violated the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act that prohibits companies from disclosing information about the videos people watch. This was based on allegations that TikTok was disclosing video-viewing history to Facebook and Google.

TikTok also allegedly violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act prohibiting companies from collecting people’s faceprints without their consent.

Amazon facing claims of violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act

Amazon is facing claims that it violated BIPA.

In a class action lawsuit from users of online learning company Proctor U, students taking online tests were required to show their student ID to verify their identity - and used Amazon’s Rekognition facial recognition technology on the ID’s image without consent.

In this case, the student photographs were apparently converted to “faceprints” which allowed for use of the facial recognition software. However, if the student ID photograph alone was being used as a one-to-one match to verify that the photograph on the ID matches the student sitting in front of the camera, that would not be use of biometrics, as pictures alone and one-to-one matches are not use of biometric technology.

Children’s Privacy Bills

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation passed two federal bills to protect children’s privacy.

This includes the Children and Teens Online Privacy Protection Act, an enhancement to the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). It extends COPPA’s protection from children aged 13 or younger to cover children aged 17 or younger.

The other bill is the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) that creates a duty of loyalty, requiring tech companies to prevent harm to minors and provide transparency in their algorithms for users and researchers.

INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE DISCLAIMER:

Use of, access to, and information exchanged on this web page or any of the e-mail links contained within it cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship between Han Santos, PLLC, and the user or browser. Please do not post any personal or confidential information. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.